JHRS established cooperation with Contrimetrics

Dear readers,

I am glad to announce you that today we signed and agreement with Contrimetric.

What is Contrimetric?

Contrimetric.com appears to be the online presence of Contrimetric, an academic and research support tool designed primarily for the scholarly ecosystem, particularly journal publishers, researchers, and academic institutions. Based on available information, here are the key benefits and features associated with Contrimetric:

1. Enhanced Citation and Research Impact Tracking

Contrimetric is an AI-powered bibliometric enhancement tool that helps track and analyse citation data in ways that go beyond traditional citation counts. It focuses on measuring how individual research articles contribute to broader citation metrics, such as the Journal Impact Factor (JIF). This can provide deeper insight into the influence of specific scholarly works within the academic community. 

2. Improved Discoverability and Visibility of Research

One of the main advantages of Contrimetric is that it aims to increase the visibility of research articles by making citation and engagement data more accessible in real time. This can help journals, authors, and institutions better understand which works are attracting attention and how they are being engaged with across different platforms.

3. Real-Time Metrics and Insights

Unlike traditional bibliometric indicators that may lag behind publication activity, Contrimetric reportedly provides more immediate data on scholarly attention, helping users assess article influence shortly after publication. This improves responsiveness for authors and editors monitoring their work’s reach. 

4. Support for Editors and Editorial Teams

The plugin or backend system serves editorial staff by enabling monitoring and analysis of citation patterns, readership behaviour, and related performance measures. This can support editorial decisions related to promotion, solicitation of submissions, and strategic development of journal portfolios. 

5. Complementary to Traditional Bibliometrics

Contrimetric does not replace conventional metrics but adds value by offering an alternative lens on research impact, emphasizing contribution and engagement metrics rather than simple citation counts. This complements existing frameworks like h-index or Journal Impact Factor with richer, data-driven insights. 

6. Integration with Research Workflows

The platform appears to incorporate features such as ORCID login support and backend dashboards, suggesting it can integrate smoothly with researcher identifiers and existing publishing workflows — potentially making it easier for users to adopt and manage their research analytics.

JHRS Editor-in-Chief

Experiences of People with Motor Disabilities and Visual Impairments in Croatia with Assistive Technology

Renata Pinjatela 

University of Zagreb, Faculty of Education and Rehabilitation Sciences, Zagreb, Croatia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5601-1425

Sonja Alimović 

University of Zagreb, Faculty of Education and Rehabilitation Sciences, Zagreb, Croatia

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2122-7944

https://doi.org/10.33700/jhrs.4.2.181

Abstract

Introduction: Assistive technology (AT) is a term that encompasses assistive products, and the systems and services associated with them. Despite existing legislation and the fact that AT is an important part of this process, there are many barriers to access AT. The purpose of this study is to explore the differences in the evaluation of the assistive technology (AT) availability and the AT services quality in Croatia between people with visual impairments (IwVI) and people with motor disabilities (IwMD).

Methods: We created an online questionnaire about knowledge of AT, previous training and the need for further training, and the benefits and challenges regarding AT. In addition to the online questionnaire, we obtained qualitative data on AT use.

Results: The results show that most participants were not aware of AT before they started using it but also did not know about their rights to benefits and the purchase of AT. Participants reported financial problems in purchasing assistive devices and were forced to fund AT from their own resources or through donations. Many of the participants, regardless of the type of disability, had and still have problems with AT that are not adapted to their personal abilities and needs.

Conclusion: To improve access to AT and the quality of services, it is necessary to bring together professionals and experienced AT users who will disseminate accurate and trustworthy information to ensure the best cost-benefit ratio of AT for individuals with different disabilities.

Keywords: Quality of assistive technology services, people with visual impairments, people with motor disabilities

Full Text Article

Exploring an inclusive educational program within Higher Education for individual with Intellectual Disabilities

Catherine Kelly Mason 

South East Technological University, Waterford, Ireland

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7327-6452

Vicki Anderson 

South East Technological University, Waterford, Ireland

https://orcid.org/0009-0000-3376-7599

Louise Bennett 

South East Technological University, Waterford, Ireland

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0311-2959

Martina Gooney 

South East Technological University, Waterford, Ireland

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1499-3472

Sara Kennedy 

South East Technological University, Waterford, Ireland

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6132-0735

Cathy Pembroke 

South East Technological University, Waterford, Ireland

https://orcid.org/0009-0001-6955-2722

https://doi.org/10.33700/jhrs.4.2.180

Abstract

Introduction: Individuals with Intellectual Disability (ID) have traditionally been excluded from Higher Education (HE). As HE moves towards more inclusive practices for individuals with ID, there is a need to capture the experience of support staff implementing and facilitating such programs. This paper explores an inclusive educational program within higher level designed specifically for individuals with an ID from support staff’s perspective.

Methods: A qualitative design was employed, utilising a focus group interview and purposive sampling to gather in-depth insights.

Results: This study highlights the transformative potential of an inclusive program in HE for students, staff, the University and the wider community. Findings demonstrate that when educational environments can embrace co-creation, collaboration, and a values-driven approach, students have the opportunity to experience meaningful growth in their confidence, self-esteem, social integration and capacity. Staff and peers are further provided with opportunities to challenge assumptions, increase understanding and gain renewed perspectives on teaching, learning and inclusion. However, despite the evident benefits, without secure investment, sustained policy commitment and a systemic culture change, such opportunities are limited.

Conclusion: This study has implications for the further development and sustainability of inclusive education for individuals with ID in HE nationally and internationally. Further research to examine student perspectives is warranted, to inform the future development and delivery of inclusive programs for individuals with an ID.

Keywords: Inclusive education, Higher Education, Intellectual Disability, Empowerment, co-creation, collaboration, confidence, support staff

Full Text Article

Enhancing the Visibility and Impact of JHRS Publications

Dear Members of the JHRS Editorial Board and Prospective Authors,

We are pleased to inform you that Issue 2, Volume 4 of the Journal of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences (JHRS) was officially published on 20th December. The issue is available at the following LINK.

Please note that the submission deadline for the forthcoming issue is 31st January.

I would like to draw your attention to the increasing importance of social media and academic networking platforms in contemporary scientific publishing. A growing body of evidence indicates that articles which are shared, mentioned, cited, and linked across social and scholarly platforms—such as Facebook, X (Twitter), LinkedIn, Mendeley, ResearchGate, Academia.edu, and similar networks—tend to achieve greater visibility and higher citation rates than those that are not actively disseminated.

I therefore kindly encourage all of you to share and promote your previously published articles in JHRS via your personal and professional online profiles. This can be done very easily: on the right-hand menu of the JHRS website, you will find social media sharing buttons that allow you to disseminate any article of interest with just one click. The entire process takes less than one minute, yet it can have a meaningful impact.

By doing so, you will contribute to:

• increasing the visibility and citation potential of individual JHRS articles,
• strengthening the international reach and scientific impact of the journal, and
• enhancing the overall dissemination of research in the field of health and rehabilitation sciences.

I personally and actively promote numerous JHRS articles through both my personal and journal-related social media accounts, and I strongly believe that collective engagement will further amplify our shared success.

We are also proud to note that JHRS is indexed in several important international databases, including Scopus, EBSCO, ScienceOpen, ERIH PLUS, Hinari and more others.

Finally, we warmly encourage you to consider submitting new manuscripts to JHRS in the near future. We would be honored to receive your scholarly contributions.

Thank you for your continued support and collaboration.

With kind regards,

Editor-in-Chief

Journal of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences

JHRS activities and achievements in 2025

Dear Authors, Reviewers, and Readers of the Journal of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences,

We are pleased to present the Journal of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences (JHRS) review of 2025—a year marked by measurable growth, scholarly impact, and shared academic achievement.

Throughout 2025, JHRS continued to advance scientific excellence in the fields of health and rehabilitation by publishing high-quality empirical research, systematic reviews, and innovative clinical contributions. These works have meaningfully supported evidence-based practice and informed contemporary academic and clinical discourse. During this period, the journal expanded its international reach through new indexing milestones, increased article downloads, and growing engagement from the global research community.

We extend our sincere appreciation to our authors, whose rigorous and original research forms the foundation of the journal; to our reviewers, for their critical, constructive, and timely evaluations that uphold scientific quality; and to our Editorial Board, for their steadfast commitment to academic integrity and strategic scholarly leadership. Above all, we thank our readers, whose interest and engagement continuously inspire our mission.

The year 2025 was also characterized by impactful international collaborations, and multidisciplinary dialogue that transcended institutional and geographical boundaries. As we look ahead to 2026, JHRS reaffirms its commitment to innovation, open-access publishing, ethical scholarship, and the continuous advancement of health and rehabilitation sciences.

We kindly invite you to view our 85-second overview video highlighting JHRS activities and achievements in 2025 HERE:

On behalf of the entire editorial team, we thank you for your continued trust and collaboration and wish you a prosperous and successful New Year 2026.

JHRS Editorial Office

Journal of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences

Treatment of Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD) Using ReAttach Therapy and an Eclectic Approach: A Case Study of a 27-Year-Old Unmarried Hindu Female Engineering Graduate

Ashutosh Srivastava 

Clinical & Counseling Psychology Assam Downtown University, Panikhaiti, Guwahati, India

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2190-4327
Mohadeseh Bita 

Department of Social Sciences, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran 

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2693-7411

https://doi.org/10.33700/jhrs.4.2.156

Abstract

Background: Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD) is a complex psychiatric condition characterised by persistent emotional dysregulation, a fragmented self-image, impulsive behaviors, and significant difficulties in maintaining interpersonal relationships. Managing BPD poses notable challenges, particularly when accounting for the impact of various cultural contexts on symptom expression and treatment methodologies.

Objectives: This case study aimed to assess the effectiveness of an eclectic treatment approach that integrates ReAttach Therapy with established interventions for the management of BPD. The subject of the study was a 27-year-old unmarried Hindu female engineering graduate diagnosed with BPD.

Methods: The intervention lasted 52 weeks and combined ReAttach Therapy as the primary modality with Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT), Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT), and mindfulness practices. Standardised psychometric tools (BSL-23, DERS, and BDI-II) were administered before and after treatment to evaluate outcomes.

Results: The results indicate significant improvements in emotional regulation, a decrease in fears of abandonment, stabilisation in relationships, and enhanced psychological resilience. These findings suggest that the combination of ReAttach Therapy with eclectic techniques presents a promising and culturally adaptable framework for managing BPD.

Conclusions: The integrative approach resulted in a considerable reduction in BPD symptoms, indicating that ReAttach Therapy, when used in conjunction with eclectic techniques, may offer an effective and culturally responsive strategy for treating BPD.

Keywords: Borderline Personality Disorder, Case Study, Eclectic Approach, ReAttach Therapy

Full Text Article

Development and validation of Thought, Language, and Communication Assessment Scale for Persons with Aphasia

Sampath Muthu Lakshmipriya 

Department of Speech-Language Pathology, School of Rehabilitation and Behavioral Sciences, Vinayaka Mission’s Research Foundation (DU), Puducherry, India 

https://orcid.org/0009-0003-7362-3129

Nagaraj Hema 

Department of Speech-Language Sciences, All India Institute of Speech and Hearing, Mysuru, India

https://orcid.org/0009-0001-4177-6839

https://doi.org/10.33700/jhrs.4.2.165

Abstract

Introduction: Aphasia impacts language and thought organization, disrupting effective communication. Thought, Language, and Communication (TLC) are interrelated, and breakdowns in one domain often affect the others. A comprehensive assessment tool is essential to understand and address these interlinks. This study aimed to develop and validate the Thought, Language, and Communication Assessment Scale for Persons with Aphasia (TLCAS-PWA) for Persons with Aphasia (PWA) and Neurotypical Individuals (NTI).
Method: The tool was developed through literature review and expert validation, comprising 14 parameters across communication, language, and thought domains, rated on a 5-point scale. It was administered to 20 PWA and 20 NTI.
Results: Among PWA, PCS showed the highest mean scores, while Self-reference was least frequent. At the domain level, both PWA and NTI had higher scores in Communication Disorder and lower in Language Disorder. Mann-Whitney U tests revealed significant differences between groups across all the domains. Psychometric analysis showed good internal consistency (α = 0.88), excellent inter-rater reliability (ICC = 0.98), and stable test–retest reliability.
Conclusion: TLCAS-PWA is a valid tool that aids clinicians in assessing TLC in aphasia, supporting diagnosis, intervention, and progress monitoring.

Keywords: TLCAS-PWA, Language and Thought Impairment, Aphasia, TLC interrelated

Full Text Article

Evaluation of horizontal fusional vergence in young children with intermittent exotropia using the synoptophore and prism bar

Rajesh Kumar 

Department of Optometry, Nims College of Allied & Health care Sciences, NIMS University Rajasthan, Jaipur, Rajasthan, 303121 India

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6032-2437

Malhar Tushar Vyas 

Department of Ophthalmology, Nims University Rajasthan, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India

https://orcid.org/0009-0004-2123-6634

Neebha Passi 

Regional Institute of Ophthalmology, Pt. B. D. Sharma Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Rohtak, Haryana, India

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4387-3357

https://doi.org/10.33700/jhrs.4.2.159

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of the study was to compare the synoptophore and prism bar for assessing horizontal fusional vergence (HFV) in young children with intermittent exotropia (IXT).
Methods: The research involved ninety-eight subjects with IXT, aged between six and sixteen years. The examination included vision assessment, a cover test, identification of the dominant eye, and measurement of the angle of deviation using a prism bar. The subjects' HFV (positive and negative fusional vergence) was assessed using a horizontal prism bar and synoptophore at both near and far distances. We assessed IXT's control utilizing the Newcastle score for both near and far distances.
Results: The positive fusional vergence (PFV) break points of the synoptophore above those of the prism bar at both near and distance ranges (P < 0.01). There was a statistically significant difference in PFV recovery points for both near (P < 0.01) and distance (P < 0.01). There were no statistically significant changes in the near-negative fusional vergence (NFV) blur and break points as determined by the prism bar and synoptophore. The distance, NFV blur, and break points were larger on the synoptophore compared to the prism bar (P < 0.01).The difference in NFV recovery points was statistically significant at both near (P = 0.05) and distance (P = 0.03).
Conclusion: It is essential to exercise caution when assessing the PFV and NFV in young children with IXT, as the synoptophore and prism bar are not comparable in these kinds of situations.

Keywords: Intermittent exotropia, Horizontal Fusional vergence, synoptophore, prism bar, office control score, step vergence method

Full Text Article

Functional and Anatomical Outcomes Following Intravitreal Bevacizumab in Treatment-Naïve Centre-Involving Diabetic Macular Edema: A 3-Month Prospective Evaluation

Sanjay Kumar Mishra 

Nims College of Allied and Health Care Sciences, Nims University Rajasthan, Jaipur Rajasthan, India

https://orcid.org/0009-0003-0636-7727

Tejinder Singh Ahluwalia 

Department of Ophthalmology, Nims University, Rajasthan, Jaipur, India

https://orcid.org/0009-0002-3527-061X

Rajpal Vohra 

Vitreo-Retina Services at Dr. Rajendra Prasad Centre for Ophthalmic Sciences, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi, India

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3308-969X

Rohan Chawla 

Vitreo-Retina Services at Dr. Rajendra Prasad Centre for Ophthalmic Sciences, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi, India

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6791-4435

https://doi.org/10.33700/jhrs.4.2.172

Abstract

Introduction: Diabetic macular edema (DME) remains a major cause of vision impairment worldwide. Intravitreal bevacizumab, though used off-label, is an established therapy for centre-involved DME (CI-DME). This study evaluated how effectively microperimetry complements standard measures—best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central macular thickness (CMT)—in assessing treatment outcomes.

Methods: In this prospective observational study, 52 eyes with treatment-naïve CI-DME received three monthly bevacizumab injections. BCVA, CMT (via OCT), and mean retinal sensitivity (by microperimetry) were recorded at baseline, one month, and three months. Statistical analyses included the Wilcoxon signed-rank test for repeated measures and Spearman’s rank correlation for structure–function relationships.

Results: After three months, mean BCVA improved from 0.50 ± 0.095 to 0.67 ± 0.088 (p < 0.001), while CMT decreased from 401.9 ± 87.6 µm to 329.5 ± 23.2 µm (p < 0.001). Mean retinal sensitivity rose from 14.96 ± 1.01 dB to 16.50 ± 1.39 dB (p < 0.001). Improvement in BCVA correlated positively with both CMT reduction (ρ = 0.340, p = 0.014) and sensitivity gain (ρ = 0.412, p = 0.004), while CMT reduction correlated inversely with sensitivity improvement (ρ = –0.367, p = 0.009).

Conclusion: Three consecutive bevacizumab injections resulted in significant anatomical and functional recovery in eyes with CI-DME. The consistent correlations between macular structure and function underscore the value of microperimetry as a sensitive, complementary tool for evaluating therapeutic response beyond standard acuity and OCT metrics.

Keywords: Diabetic Macular Edema, Bevacizumab, Central Macular Thickness, Anti-VEGF, Retinal Sensitivity, Microperimetry, OCT, Intravitreal Injection

Full Text Article

The latest issue (Vol.4, No.2, 2025) has been published

Dear Colleagues and Readers,

We are pleased to announce that Volume 4, Issue 2 of the Journal of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences (JHRS) has been published online today, December 20, 2025. This issue comprises a total of seven peer-reviewed articles. The forthcoming issue, Volume 5, Issue 1 (2026), is scheduled for publication by June 30, 2026.

 
Access to JHRS

The current issue and all published articles are available online via the journal platform. Readers, researchers, and students may access full-text PDF, HTML and XML versions of all articles without restriction. Journal of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences is an open-access, international, peer-reviewed, and non-profit journal, ensuring free and unlimited access to its scholarly content.
Citation of Articles and Use of DOI

When citing articles published in JHRS, authors are strongly encouraged to include the Digital Object Identifier (DOI) alongside standard bibliographic information. The DOI represents an international standard for persistent identification of digital content and ensures long-term accessibility, even if the article’s web location changes. Accordingly, the DOI should be used preferentially over direct URLs when referencing JHRS articles.
Online Features for Authors

By registering on the JHRS online submission system
(https://jhrs.almamater.si/index.php/jhrs/user/register), authors gain continuous access to information related to manuscript submission, review processes, and publication updates. We encourage authors and readers to disseminate JHRS publications within their academic networks and through social media platforms, thereby enhancing the visibility and impact of published research.

We warmly invite you to explore the content of Journal of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences and to consider JHRS as a venue for disseminating your scholarly work.

Call for Papers

The Call for Papers for Volume 5, Issue 1 is open until January 31, 2026.
Suggested thematic areas include:

• Rehabilitation Research
• Health Research
• Special Education Research
• Psychological Research
• Neuropsychological Research
• Autism Spectrum Disorders
• Disability Research
• Medical Aspects of Disability
• Social Aspects of Disability
• Master’s and Doctoral (PhD) Theses in the Field
• Book Reviews relevant to the scope of the journal

If you have any questions or you face problems with paper submission, please feel free to contact us: editorjhrs@almamater.si. We look forward to your valuable contributions and continued engagement with JHRS.

With kind regards,
Editorial Team
Journal of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences