Anja Knez SFU Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia https://orcid.org/0009-0005-9008-2314
https://doi.org/10.33700/jhrs.2.2.84Abstract
The purpose of the paper is to encourage a critical attitude and shed light on the background and perception (and not the definition) of “normal” through the prism of society, which to a large extent conditions human functioning and well-being. Understanding the variability of normality and mental health as a socially defined and ever-changing concept leads to normalisation and de -stigmatisation of not only mental disorders in the narrower sense, but also of mental distress of modern man, and is a prerequisite for reducing false diagnoses. Human vulnerability and inner struggles, which are the norm, not a peculiar, isolated problem, need to be seen as such while taking into account all the factors, i.e., biological, psychological, and social, affecting the person. A better understanding and use of the biopsychosocial model could help improve healthcare and make this world a little kinder.
Keywords: objectivity, normality, freedom, biomedical model, biopsychosocial model
No comments:
Post a Comment